<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Gigs Shrugged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Dose of Technology and Second Life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Toward a Server Enforced Security Model by What needs to be done&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=26#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>What needs to be done&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=26#comment-562</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=26 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=26" rel="nofollow">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=26</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Recent L$ Weakness&#8230; by Lindex Rate Monitoring - Page 9 - SLUniverse Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=85#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindex Rate Monitoring - Page 9 - SLUniverse Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=85#comment-549</guid>
		<description>[...] from 286 to 299, not counting small amounts at other rates.    I don't see it as disorderly.  Gigs Shrugged Blog Archive On the Recent L$ Weakness&#8230;   __________________ - - &#34;It is the paramount duty of governments and of politicians to secure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from 286 to 299, not counting small amounts at other rates.    I don&#8217;t see it as disorderly.  Gigs Shrugged Blog Archive On the Recent L$ Weakness&#8230;   __________________ - - &quot;It is the paramount duty of governments and of politicians to secure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libertarianism&#8217;s Shift Against Intellectual Monopolies by Olivia Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=74#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=74#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Most countries in the third world never respects intellectual property rights. piracy is so rampant in asian countries.-";</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most countries in the third world never respects intellectual property rights. piracy is so rampant in asian countries.-&#8221;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join the NRA: Get Lots of Spam by Gigs</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=68#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=68#comment-507</guid>
		<description>I did find this a few weeks later, and it seems to have mostly worked, you should try it even if you aren't a member:

"Simply email us at membership@nrahq.org or dial 800-NRA-3888 and request to be placed on the "Do Not Promote" list. This will significantly reduce the amount of mail you receive without affecting important mailings, magazine service, or your membership renewal."

They don't make this information easy to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did find this a few weeks later, and it seems to have mostly worked, you should try it even if you aren&#8217;t a member:</p>
<p>&#8220;Simply email us at <a href="mailto:membership@nrahq.org">membership@nrahq.org</a> or dial 800-NRA-3888 and request to be placed on the &#8220;Do Not Promote&#8221; list. This will significantly reduce the amount of mail you receive without affecting important mailings, magazine service, or your membership renewal.&#8221;</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t make this information easy to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join the NRA: Get Lots of Spam by Umm....</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=68#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Umm....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=68#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I never even joined, and I get tons of spam from them. I just started getting them out of the blue one day. I don't want any of their emails, and I don't know how they got my email address, but no matter how many I "unsubscribe" from they just keep coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never even joined, and I get tons of spam from them. I just started getting them out of the blue one day. I don&#8217;t want any of their emails, and I don&#8217;t know how they got my email address, but no matter how many I &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; from they just keep coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Linden Lab Time Capsule by rriocard</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>rriocard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Nothing fails like success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing fails like success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Linden Lab Time Capsule by Too Late</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Late</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Many compared early Second Life to a Libertarian paradise, to the extent such could be implemented on servers in a non-free country. It seems to be true. Libertarianism is a big tent philosophy with a bunch of pragmatically selected, unintegrated tenets. "Principles" are discarded just as pragmatically as they are adopted. This was why Rand was vocal about her detest for Libertarianism.
The writing was on the wall when micro parcel owners were told the governance team would enact arbitrary, undefined price caps. Ditto when advertising and land cutting policy were set. Few cared because the victims in these scenarios were almost universally detested. Come the fourth pass, everybody suddenly caes. But the principle is long since dead, and Linden Lab is used to using property use restrictions, imposed retroactively.
Second Life has grown large without any kind of a charter contract guaranteeing property, expression, or other fundamental rights. The larger it grows still, and the wider its audience, the more difficult the task of commanding an interest group of relevant size. If you want clarity and predictable governance, it may already be too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many compared early Second Life to a Libertarian paradise, to the extent such could be implemented on servers in a non-free country. It seems to be true. Libertarianism is a big tent philosophy with a bunch of pragmatically selected, unintegrated tenets. &#8220;Principles&#8221; are discarded just as pragmatically as they are adopted. This was why Rand was vocal about her detest for Libertarianism.<br />
The writing was on the wall when micro parcel owners were told the governance team would enact arbitrary, undefined price caps. Ditto when advertising and land cutting policy were set. Few cared because the victims in these scenarios were almost universally detested. Come the fourth pass, everybody suddenly caes. But the principle is long since dead, and Linden Lab is used to using property use restrictions, imposed retroactively.<br />
Second Life has grown large without any kind of a charter contract guaranteeing property, expression, or other fundamental rights. The larger it grows still, and the wider its audience, the more difficult the task of commanding an interest group of relevant size. If you want clarity and predictable governance, it may already be too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Linden Lab Time Capsule by Edward G</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-427</guid>
		<description>The trouble is - that dream of a social space without rules or laws exists in a world of laws and criminals.  Linden Labs provides SL as a products.  

LL had no choice in the gambling ban.  It's servers and HQ are on US soil.  Gambling in SL was breaking the law and MANY Attourney's General were working on a case against them.  
As international law in several countries is written, child sex (even only as role play between consenting adults) was breaking the law. 
Violations of intellectual property must be investigated and pursued under US law, or the entire server system can be shut dow as a remedy. This can't be done on a community level. 
MANY businesses and universities, which are the core of Linden Labs income and product offerings, have no exception policies in place regarding tolerance for nudity, even virtual.  

As to community governance, LL has not made move one to explore that further, and eve attempt any implementation of that.  So the Linden dream was starry eyed optimism from the start.  It is totally unworkable on any real life system.   

Some form of the changes coming are unescapable.  LL can't continue as a business with it's continued international reputation as a sex pit, and with the continued derision and fear of the business community because everyone "knows" that SL is only for sex crazed looses.  WE know that that is totally false - but the international press does not.  

But do not confuse this post with blind apology for LL and the way they have handled these issues in SL in the past.   Zoning and age verification are onerous.  Given the past history of implementation of such policy changes, there's little room for blind optimism.  But the only reason and "Adult" area would be a ghetto is if the users make it one.  It surely will be if the sleazy builds and sloppy looking decor of most adult entertainment places in SL are just throw together in one area.  Quality builds are not such a rarity among private  Islands.  But the story is different on the mainland.  Honestly . . . what percentage of mainland  "Adult" builds have you seen that truly hold much aesthetic appeal?  My point is not to get into what is good or isn't. It's simply that I challenge the premise that such a move automatically means a ghetto.  

There are many questions to be answered yet.  How will the move work?  If someone who has an Adult business has friends who do not choose to age verify - do they then have to have a separate house in a un-zoned area to see them?  Does an Art Galley that features an SL display of GLBT art become Adult because it mixes sexuality and art while a display of Michelangelo Buonarroti's "David" is ok in a Mature area because that's in Art books?

At every single turn LL has acted ham handedly and clumsily in implementing large changes.  They have been late and they have been erratic when they DO act.  Their approval then banning of skins for child avatars is an example.  Their inexcusable gambling policy implementation ruined many innocent players, costing them thousands of real life dollars. 

So I suggest that you work with others in SL and form a consensus view on how these changes should be implemented.   If we speak with the clear voice of consensus and reason, then perhaps, LL will listen and we can at last see a glimpse of the utopian dream of a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble is - that dream of a social space without rules or laws exists in a world of laws and criminals.  Linden Labs provides SL as a products.  </p>
<p>LL had no choice in the gambling ban.  It&#8217;s servers and HQ are on US soil.  Gambling in SL was breaking the law and MANY Attourney&#8217;s General were working on a case against them.<br />
As international law in several countries is written, child sex (even only as role play between consenting adults) was breaking the law.<br />
Violations of intellectual property must be investigated and pursued under US law, or the entire server system can be shut dow as a remedy. This can&#8217;t be done on a community level.<br />
MANY businesses and universities, which are the core of Linden Labs income and product offerings, have no exception policies in place regarding tolerance for nudity, even virtual.  </p>
<p>As to community governance, LL has not made move one to explore that further, and eve attempt any implementation of that.  So the Linden dream was starry eyed optimism from the start.  It is totally unworkable on any real life system.   </p>
<p>Some form of the changes coming are unescapable.  LL can&#8217;t continue as a business with it&#8217;s continued international reputation as a sex pit, and with the continued derision and fear of the business community because everyone &#8220;knows&#8221; that SL is only for sex crazed looses.  WE know that that is totally false - but the international press does not.  </p>
<p>But do not confuse this post with blind apology for LL and the way they have handled these issues in SL in the past.   Zoning and age verification are onerous.  Given the past history of implementation of such policy changes, there&#8217;s little room for blind optimism.  But the only reason and &#8220;Adult&#8221; area would be a ghetto is if the users make it one.  It surely will be if the sleazy builds and sloppy looking decor of most adult entertainment places in SL are just throw together in one area.  Quality builds are not such a rarity among private  Islands.  But the story is different on the mainland.  Honestly . . . what percentage of mainland  &#8220;Adult&#8221; builds have you seen that truly hold much aesthetic appeal?  My point is not to get into what is good or isn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s simply that I challenge the premise that such a move automatically means a ghetto.  </p>
<p>There are many questions to be answered yet.  How will the move work?  If someone who has an Adult business has friends who do not choose to age verify - do they then have to have a separate house in a un-zoned area to see them?  Does an Art Galley that features an SL display of GLBT art become Adult because it mixes sexuality and art while a display of Michelangelo Buonarroti&#8217;s &#8220;David&#8221; is ok in a Mature area because that&#8217;s in Art books?</p>
<p>At every single turn LL has acted ham handedly and clumsily in implementing large changes.  They have been late and they have been erratic when they DO act.  Their approval then banning of skins for child avatars is an example.  Their inexcusable gambling policy implementation ruined many innocent players, costing them thousands of real life dollars. </p>
<p>So I suggest that you work with others in SL and form a consensus view on how these changes should be implemented.   If we speak with the clear voice of consensus and reason, then perhaps, LL will listen and we can at last see a glimpse of the utopian dream of a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Linden Lab Time Capsule by kesseret</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>kesseret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=75#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libertarianism&#8217;s Shift Against Intellectual Monopolies by Economists Say Copyright and Patent/Copyright Laws Are Hurting Economy - SLUniverse Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=74#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Economists Say Copyright and Patent/Copyright Laws Are Hurting Economy - SLUniverse Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gigstaggart.com/blog/?p=74#comment-425</guid>
		<description>[...] Ya rly. For a long time, it was something that I differed from other libertarians on too. It's only recent that many libertarians have begun taking positions against the current situation on patents and copyrights.  You go back about 5 years, and most libertarians were defending copyright and patents as an extension of property rights.  I wrote a blog about this a few months back, when I first heard of these professor's work.  Gigs Shrugged » Blog Archive » Libertarianism&#8217;s Shift Against Intellectual Monopolies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ya rly. For a long time, it was something that I differed from other libertarians on too. It&#8217;s only recent that many libertarians have begun taking positions against the current situation on patents and copyrights.  You go back about 5 years, and most libertarians were defending copyright and patents as an extension of property rights.  I wrote a blog about this a few months back, when I first heard of these professor&#8217;s work.  Gigs Shrugged » Blog Archive » Libertarianism&#8217;s Shift Against Intellectual Monopolies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
